Anti-Freedom, Anti-Life ‘Progressive’ Continues Democrat Tactics of Obstruction and Subversion

Published by: 0

Facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinteresttumblrmailby feather


“Dems walk out before baby-body-parts buyer cited for contempt,” Bob Unruh reports at “Democrats on the U.S. House Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives walked out of a committee meeting rather than be present to vote on a congressional contempt citation for a company caught up in the undercover video investigation of Planned Parenthood’s baby body parts trade.”

Obstruction and disruption is a standard “progressive” modus operandi for Democrats who don’t get their way. Abusing their duties and their oaths by resorting to interference and antics, and redirecting the easily and willfully misled (i.e., their constituencies) with red herring talking points have come to be standard operating procedure.  They did it to give cover for the administration’s criminal Fast and Furious “gunwalking” enterprise, and to try and derail Eric Holder’s in-your-face obstruction of justice stonewalling.  More recently, they staged a childish sit-in over demands to impose more citizen disarmament edicts — for which a House leadership with guts would have imposed immediate sanctions –instead of just making noise.

And, of course, when they don’t get their way they turn to their standby non sequitur by screaming “McCarthyism,” or worse, “Racism,” which generally seems to have the same effect on spineless establishment Republicans as a crucifix does on Dracula.

Thankfully, the stunt didn’t work this time, and the committee voted to approve “a report recommending StemExpress, an organ procurement company, and CEO Cate Dyer, be held in contempt of Congress [for failing] to comply with ‘lawfully issued subpoenas.’”

Which doesn’t mean we won’t see more circuses and sleight of mind stunts in the full House, whenever they get around to it. And if Hillary wins, expect administration pressure and media collaboration to render the whole exercise moot.

Barring the type of change that does not seem possible without a credible “or else” consequence, we watching from the sidelines are left with nothing much besides grumbling, and documenting the misdeeds of impostors posing as Constitutional representatives. And the “leader” of this latest walkout is sadly and outrageously what we’ve come to expect from Chicago Democrats.

“Let me have the record reflect the Democrats are refusing to participate in this illegitimate and unsanctioned effort to seek criminal contempt (charges),” Rep. Jan Schakowsky lectured “We refuse to sanction or endorse this exercise by continuing to participate.”

Perhaps, some will argue, challenging how the House has delegated authority to even hear evidence on the matter. Then again, one of the primary functions of government having power in the first place, per the Preamble to the Constitution, is “to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

It’s tough to argue that it’s not Posterity’s body parts that are being bought and sold.

Perhaps if government ever gets compelled to put the chains it’s supposed to be bound by back on, the whole house of cards will come tumbling down, and all kinds of unauthorized areas they inflict themselves in will once more be off limits.

It’s a sure bet Jan Schakowsky and her fellow subversives won’t like that one bit.

You know how the Democrats are always telling us “Nobody wants to take your guns”? Schakowsky does, and wants “everything on the table.” And she not only has our “assault weapons”[sic]  in her sights, she’s also “against handguns.

“[W]e’re on a roll now, and I think we’ve got to take the — you know, we’re gonna push as hard as we can and as far as we can,” she revealed.

“Oh absolutely,” she replied when asked if the semiauto ban “was the beginning of something larger.”

Does that mean she’s anti-gun? Not at all — like all typical Opposite Day “progressives,” what she’s really against is the true egalitarian power sharing enabled by the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

As far as fellow Marxist elites, look no further than her associations, particularly her “close ties” via the Congressional Progressive Caucus (co-founded by Bernie Sanders!) to the Democratic Socialists of America. We had a chance to see what those subversives are all about when we looked at another extremist DSA mole, Muslim Rep. Keith Ellison. And in that piece, we dug out some old DSA “solidarity” songs, which have since been removed from their website in an attempt to hide them — talk of violently killing people you hate doesn’t play all that well with people you want to call “haters.”

Fortunately they have not been “disappeared” from the Internet Archive. Here are two songs of special interest that every American who considers himself a patriot ought to be aware of:

Are You Sleeping, Bourgeoisie

Traditional American song, sung in rounds to the tune of “Frere Jacques”.

Are you sleeping, Are you sleeping,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie,
And when the revolution comes,
We’ll kill you all with knives and guns,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie


Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie, See How They Run

Usually sung in rounds after “Are You Sleeping, Bourgeoisie”. Sung to the tune of “Three Blind Mice”.

Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie,
See how they run,
See how they run

And when the revolution comes,
We’ll kill them all with knives and guns,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie

Remember, in addition to those who own capital, bourgeoisie as a whole includes the middle class. Sounds like fertile ground for more blood-soaked killing fields, doesn’t it? Any questions about why this oath-breaking Schakowsky hag and her fellow domestic enemies don’t want you to have a gun?

Or how the people of Illinois’ 9th Congressional District can be so damned oblivious and/or dependent and/or corrupt and/or just plain stupid to keep giving this monster power over their (and our) lives?

And yes, of course, when it comes to Hillary, she’s with her.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *